Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for April, 2025

May life grant you peace, even if peace has rarely visited our doorstep. Lately, I am haunted by the weight of all we’ve lost—not just time, but lifetimes of tenderness we never knew how to hold. I miss the fragile joys of youth, the moments that slipped past us unnoticed, the laughter we swallowed, the dreams we buried.

Their ghosts walk beside me still.

Even if I wanted to forget, I couldn’t. And perhaps, I shouldn’t. They are etched into me, and I into them.

I ache for the good days we imagined we had—but never truly did. I remember sharpening pencils over and over, hoping it would make someone sit and write, to follow the rules I thought were best. I was young, certain, foolish. I believed discipline could shape success. I had no idea that I was trimming wings.

Dearest siblings, forgive me for my smallness—for mistaking conformity for care. I didn’t recognize the brilliance in you, the way your minds worked outside the lines. I only wanted you to thrive in a world I didn’t understand myself.

This letter is for you—for the versions of you that never got to live freely. The world still owes you a life untainted by expectation and fear.

And I owe you, too. I owe you everything.

I see now how we—all of us—were failed. And yes, I carry that failure. I carry it in every breath, in every ache. Back then, I longed to speak of sorrow, of longing, of hope. But to whom could I speak? We had no language for pain.

Still, I won’t pretend innocence. I judged you. Compared you. Criticized you. Let go of your hands when I should’ve pulled you in close. In my silence, I betrayed you.

We were never taught the language of affection. Our home—more outpost than haven—was ruled by discipline, not connection. And so we grew without the tools for love.

They say life can be learned. I believe that now. Even love, even cruelty, even silence—they are all passed down. And we? We are miswritten texts from a broken lineage. We were denied joy, and handed shame.

But I no longer blame. I have come to see: they did not know any better. We are the echoes of an unfinished war, survivors of an education that taught obedience and fear—but not compassion.

If only we’d learned from Rumi, from Shams, from Saadi. If only poetry had raised us instead of pressure.

Growing up, I thought we shared nothing. But now, I see we are bound in wounds we could never name. I bury myself in history, philosophy, sociology—trying to decode our damage. Perhaps you’ve never read those books, but I know you’ve lived their truths. The ache in your silences, the brilliance behind your defiance—they say more than words ever could.

You are meaning to me, and I to you.

Today’s children know more than we did. Or at least, they have more tools to make sense of their world. We must be careful. Our children are watching. Our actions will shape what they believe they deserve.

You cannot understand today if you are still shackled to yesterday. Let go of the rusted rules. Think beyond our broken culture.

We were test subjects in a failed experiment. The system burned, and we were blamed for the smoke. Then they rebuilt the cage, only tighter—hoping this time, it would hold. But we are not the same. We are the children of fire now.

And I love you. Fiercely. Quietly. Endlessly.

I admire you—not for what you became, but for surviving what you were never meant to endure.

I know some of you should’ve been out in the open—on fields, on courts, in places full of light. Instead, you were imprisoned—by silence, by pain, by expectations. Forgive me. Forgive me for living while you were locked away.

Even now, unanswered calls pull me back into that panic—the fear that I won’t know if you’re safe. That I’ll be left guessing again.

Come with me now. Walk back with me through the ruins of our childhood. Remember the bicycles? The first poems memorized by heart? The cousins who challenged us without ever understanding what they were up against? You were not ordinary. You were lightning. And we—we missed it. Forgive us.

You were extraordinary, and we were just trying to keep up.

There’s still more I want to say—so much more. Will you walk this memory with me?

We had to memorize a verse five times to remember it. You absorbed it in one go. Because you were wired differently—beautifully.

I envy every athlete I see. Not for their strength, but because they remind me of yours. And I mourn what we lost. What we didn’t see in time.

Let me tell you everything from the beginning. Let me unbury the stories of our survival—and my guilt.

As a girl, I wanted to live simply. I wanted to go to small gatherings with friends, to laugh without burden. But I couldn’t. I had to watch over you. You, with your wild hearts, made me feel embarrassed and ashamed when I should’ve felt proud and protective. I was selfish. I was too young to be anyone’s guardian.

And then—like thunder—it was gone. My youth. Your childhood. Both stolen by time.

We were bent by forces too large to see. And I learned too late that time only makes you regret—not responsible, just haunted.

When I left, you gave up. On school, on hope. And I—fool that I was—thought I had finally escaped. I didn’t know I had left my heart behind.

I dreamed of leaning on you, of having a sibling strong enough to protect me from life. But I hadn’t stayed to help you grow into that role.

And your distance—the walls you built—became my prison, too.

I blame myself.

If only I had sat with my conscience sooner. If only we had spoken, truly spoken, as equals. Perhaps we could have saved something.

But I was still just a girl. And fear was all I knew.

Years later, I understand: had I taken responsibility, perhaps our lives would look different. A piece of my heart always beat for you. But I wasn’t a good sister. Nor a good mother. I was always trying to return to my first duty—but I never arrived.

And now, I walk like a ghost. Alive, but without soul. Every breath is borrowed.

You wanted freedom, and we—small-minded and afraid—forced tradition upon your wildness. I can’t untangle my guilt from your pain.

I owe you the dreams you lost because of us. The ones we shamed. The ones we silenced.

We never taught you how to say goodbye to them gently. We tore them from your hands.

From the start, we built walls around your mind—because we feared what was inside. And what society feared, we feared more.

We feared you, because you were free.

You were never like us. And that terrified us.

You lived on your own terms. And we—who lived in fear—resented you for it.

We accepted our cages. You broke yours.

We forgot that you were not cursed—you were brave.

No one saw the storm inside you. And when it broke, they called it rebellion. Or madness. Or worse.

But you were never alone.

You are not the only one whose brilliance was beaten into silence. I, too, lay on the floor—helpless, voiceless. But I saw you stand.

You stood tall when others would’ve fallen. The more they tried to break your pride, the stronger you became.

Even when it was us, your own, doing the breaking.

Read Full Post »

In recent months, I’ve found myself wading into the ever-expanding sea of podcasts—a genre that promises everything from entrepreneurial mastery to spiritual enlightenment, all wrapped up in an hour of charming banter and self-assured advice. At first, I was intrigued. Who doesn’t want to learn how to live better, work smarter, love deeper? But the more I listened, the more I found myself caught not in a wave of inspiration, but in a current of discomfort.

It’s not the subjects that bother me—ambition, relationships, parenting, business. It’s the tone. The podcasters and their guests speak with a startling lack of humility. They sound less like thinkers and more like preachers. There is little room for doubt, no cautious language, no soft hedging like “this worked for me” or “in my experience.” Instead, they declare: This is how you should manage your business. This is how you must love your wife. This is how you ought to raise your children. Their language is absolute, delivered with an air of divine entitlement, as if they’ve been chosen to lead the rest of us through the fog of our inferior lives.

What’s particularly fascinating—and somewhat unsettling—is that many of these voices, regardless of where they originate, have found the Middle East to be a fertile hub for their brand of confident broadcasting. The region, with its rapidly growing tech infrastructure and appetite for modernity, has become a glamorous stage for this type of hyper-polished lifestyle evangelism. This isn’t accidental. There is significant support—financial, social, algorithmic—behind the push to promote a curated version of success: sleek, unambiguous, unyielding. It’s the kind of life you can filter on Instagram and monetize on YouTube.

But as I listen to these podcasts, I can’t help but question the entire premise. How can any one model of living, any singular formula for fulfillment, possibly account for the richness and diversity of human experience? Humans are not factory-assembled objects; we are the sum of our ancestry, our culture, our trauma, our dreams, our failures, and our stubborn contradictions. The notion that a single philosophy could be universally applied to us all is, frankly, laughable. It’s like trying to prescribe the same diet to a cactus and a whale—technically lifeforms, but that’s where the similarities end.

And yet, these podcasters go on, unwavering, echoing one another with unnerving certainty. Their catchphrases often sound like motivational threats: “The only thing standing between you and success is you.” Really? Not poverty? Not inherited trauma? Not institutional discrimination or lack of access to education and resources? Apparently, self-doubt is the only real systemic issue we need to tackle.

Of course, I’m not suggesting that all podcasts are devoid of value. Many are genuinely thought-provoking, even healing. But the ones that dominate the airwaves—those with the sleek branding, high production value, and the unmistakable whiff of sponsored superiority—rarely offer space for vulnerability, contradiction, or even the simple truth that life is messy and uncertain.

What I long for is a different kind of podcast—one that doesn’t speak at us, but with us. One that embraces nuance, uncertainty, and the complexity of being human. I imagine a title like Honestly, I Have No Idea But Let’s Think About It Together. Now that would be worth subscribing to.

Until then, I’ll continue to listen, albeit with a skeptical ear and a generous pinch of salt. And perhaps, just perhaps, I’ll hold out hope for a world where wisdom doesn’t always arrive wrapped in entitlement and an overpriced microphone.

Read Full Post »

Two Days Too Soon

My sweet Sori spins in cheer,
With cake and candles drawing near—
Yet the date, my love, is not quite right,
We’re two whole sunsets off tonight.

She celebrates before the moon
Returns us to her birthday soon,
But I, who bore her, body torn,
Refuse to praise a day unborn.

I held the time inside my soul,
Each gasp and ache, a silent toll.
A storm of sweat, a sacred hour,
That brought to life my blooming flower.

So no, my love, not just today—
The stars have not aligned that way.
Call me stubborn, old, or wise,
I just won’t tell sweet birthday lies.

It’s not that I don’t want your glee,
But truth still means the world to me.
You came in pain, in roaring grace,
On that one date, in time and place.

So twirl in ribbons, eat your treat,
Dance to your offbeat birthday beat.
But know, my love, the crown shall gleam,
On the day that matched the dream.

For I’m the keeper of your tale—
I wrote it in the storm and gale.
And when the real day finds the sky,
I’ll sing your name and toast and cry.

But till then, darling—hold the throne,
The queen of time shall stand alone.

Read Full Post »

I recently listened to a group of psychologists discussing arranged marriages, specifically the notion that parents tend to select a partner for their child based on mirroring familiar family dynamics. Essentially, the logic is: “He reminds me of your uncle—quiet, responsible, and has his own cow.” This kind of psychological rationale attempts to normalize something that, in many cases, defies logic entirely. It struck me as peculiar—almost comically so—that professionals trained to understand the infinite complexity of human behavior would reduce romantic compatibility to a familiar pattern, as if trauma bonding is just another love language.

It becomes even more bizarre when you consider that two individuals—each born into vastly different environments, molded by distinct cultural, emotional, and educational experiences—are expected to fall into harmonious union merely because their parents say, “He’s from a good family.” Ah, yes, because nothing screams compatibility like matching last names or shared shame around public displays of affection.

Let’s be honest: arranged marriages are often a glorified game of Guess Who? except the stakes are lifelong and the winners rarely smile. “Does he have a stable income?” Yes. “Did his mother die of diabetes?” Also yes. “Can he communicate emotions without causing a scene at a wedding?” Sorry you lost. Try again.

Incompetency in arranged marriages can wear many disguises. There’s the brooding poet type who writes haiku’s about his loneliness but can’t boil an egg or ask how your day was. There’s the mama’s boy who needs written permission from his mother to buy new socks. And then there’s the classic—emotionally unavailable but financially present. A man who believes buying you a washing machine on your birthday is the height of romance. “Love language? Mine is appliances.”

Psychologists, with all due respect, often overlook the subtle tragedies embedded in these unions. They talk of compatibility as though it’s a software update—just click ‘agree to all terms’ and wait for love to download. But real life isn’t an algorithm. It’s messy, layered, and often deeply unfair—especially when choices are dictated by a committee of elders who still believe mental health is cured with turmeric milk.

Perhaps the darkest humor in this is that even when these marriages falter—when silence becomes the primary form of communication and resentment ages like fine wine—the families still hail them as “successful.” Why? Because they stayed together. Never mind the chronic anxiety, emotional starvation, or whispered midnight prayers asking for an early exit.

So yes, I find it odd—alarming, even—when psychologists lend their professional weight to justify or sanitize a process that often prioritizes tradition over emotional intelligence, and social appearances over authentic connection. At the very least, can we agree that choosing a life partner shouldn’t feel like selecting a durable carpet?

Read Full Post »